So, who (or what) are we? And what does that mean for the future?

A few things I've been reading/listening to this week (and yes, some of this is rather old - takes me a while to catch up on my professional reading sometimes and then I get taken on a tangent!) have been raising the question of whether libraries and librarians are about a physical space, a specific service or program (and specific processes to support them), a specific format in which information is provided, or something more nebulous.
Of course, this is not a new question and not one that will be answered in the short term even with the interesting conversations already taking place in print, in blogs, at conferences etc., but I wanted to put down some of my thoughts...

• Our customers are moving online, but they're not all there yet. It may be another generation (or maybe never!) before we have a customer base who is comfortable with all things electronic. I'm amazed sometimes when young (to my eyes) Uni students want me to help find print materials rather than electronic (and are quite adamant in their belief that print is superior). My sister travels most months and remotely accesses many of her work tools, but finds technology too difficult/complex/frustrating to invest her private time in learning. She's smart and savvy about many things, but this is not a priority. And don't get me started on my Dad!
  We shouldn't assume that there won't be a need to continue to provide existing materials and services for the foreseeable future.

• The library as a collaborative space is very important to many people. But many people still crave a quiet space too. A place for research or just some peace. Sometimes these competing needs are from the same people with differing needs at different times. Juggling continues, particularly for Academic libraries!

•  Yes, there are many processes that we have done because they used to be needed, but may no longer be the most appropriate or required at all. Ongoing reviewing of our services/programs/procedures is healthy. However, communication of the aims of any review must be clearly communicated (and repeated as necessary) as otherwise staff may experience natural concerns about their future resulting in uncertainty. Not good for the health and vibrancy or teamwork of a library team. And review after review without benefits clearly being seen can lead to inertia or resistance (passive or aggressive). Ongoing dialogue is key to ensuring staff feel that they are an active part of the process rather than being steamrolled.

• A recurring (and rather important I think) theme is  “If we built it today what would it look like?” (Nussbaumer and Merkley 2010) This seems to be a good way to review our services and do some future dreaming.

• Dorney and Frierson (2011) have an interesting discussion of plans for reference service provision when there is no physical library (at least, not with reference librarians in situ). The librarians will be in another physical space altogether, but moving around campus and possibly logging their locations via social media. Most 'just in time' reference services will be provided remotely.
  This has relevance for Murdoch's review of service delivery (with specific emphasis for me on the reference service - I may be out of a job that I really enjoy, very soon!). Millerville's 'experiment' in alternative reference provision is certainly one to watch - nothing particularly new in the proposals, but the fact that they are not running it alongside a 'traditional' service means that the results will possibly be more meaningful.

In summary? We need to ensure that changes and 'moving with the times' are not at the expense of those who don't or can't move at the same pace that we want them to. There may need to be parallel services for some time yet (with cost implications of course) and above all, communication and education to help along those (patrons and staff) who just find the changes a little difficult but will get there in time.

Dorney, E. and E. Frierson. 2011. "Renovation as a catalyst for change".  In the Library with the Lead Pipe http://www.inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/2011/renovation-catalyst/ (accessed 3 December 2011).

Garrison, J.. 2011. What Do We Do Now?: A Case for Abandoning Yesterday and Making the Future. Reference & User Services Quarterly 51, no. 1, (October 1): 12-14.  http://www.proquest.com/ (accessed December 3, 2011). 

King, D. L. (2005). Website as destination.
http://www.davidleeking.com/2005/09/22/website-as-destination/#.Trqe_PLeIhE (accessed 3 December 2011).

Lankes, R. David (2011) A New Librarianship for a New Age. http://vimeo.com/32400532 (accessed 3 December 2011).

Nussbaumer, Alison and Merkley, Wendy. 2010. The path of transformational change. Library Management 31, no. 8/9, (October 10): 678-689.  http://www.proquest.com/ (accessed December 3, 2011).